• Users Online: 106
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 12-18

Is peripheral arterial disease associated with carotid artery disease in Egyptians? A pilot study


1 Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery Division, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Neurology, Cairo University Hospitals, Kasr Al-Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Submission04-May-2015
Date of Acceptance23-Aug-2015
Date of Web Publication15-Feb-2016

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed Sayed
MD, MRCPS, Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery Division, Cairo University Hospitals, Kasr Al-Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11562
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1110-1083.176324

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background
Atherosclerosis involves various vascular segments. The association of carotid artery disease (CAD) to peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not well investigated in Egyptian patients.
Objective
In this pilot study, our aim was to examine the relationship between PAD and CAD in an Egyptian population.
Patients and methods
We examined 37 consecutive patients with PAD for the presence of CAD. Vascular and neurologic examination and duplex assessment of extracranial and intracranial carotid system and ankle-brachial index measurement were carried out to determine whether CAD is symptomatic or not.
Results
CAD was found in 20 (54.1%) patients. Eight (21.6%) patients had significant extracranial internal carotid stenosis and 13(37%) had intracranial stenosis and were more significantly above the age of 60 years. All patients with intracranial stenosis were men. PAD with RC6 was significantly associated with cerebrovascular events (P = 0.001) and significant extracranial stenosis (P = 0.013) and intracranial internal carotid stenosis (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
Intracranial and extracranial carotid stenoses are commonly present in patients with critical PAD. Duplex ultrasound screening for CAD presence and severity may be of great benefit, especially in the elderly and patients with critical limb ischemia. These findings need to be further confirmed in a study on larger population of Egyptians.

Keywords: Carotid stenosis, intracranial stenosis, peripheral arterial disease


How to cite this article:
Sayed A, Ahmed SM, Abdelalim AM, Nagah M, Khairy H. Is peripheral arterial disease associated with carotid artery disease in Egyptians? A pilot study. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 2016;53:12-8

How to cite this URL:
Sayed A, Ahmed SM, Abdelalim AM, Nagah M, Khairy H. Is peripheral arterial disease associated with carotid artery disease in Egyptians? A pilot study. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 Dec 10];53:12-8. Available from: http://www.ejnpn.eg.net/text.asp?2016/53/1/12/176324


  Introduction Top


Atherosclerosis is a complex disease that may involve multiple vascular segments and blood vessels such as the carotid, coronary, and peripheral arteries, and is the leading causes of morbidity and mortality all over the world. In the USA, almost 800 000 deaths are reported annually in relation to vascular events [1]. Atherosclerotic diseases are expected to be the leading cause of death in developing countries in the future [2].

Atherosclerotic changes in the carotid artery mirrors general atherosclerosis. Carotid artery disease (CAD) has been linked to increased risk for stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from coronary artery disease, which may occur alone or simultaneously [3]. Carotid artery evaluation using B-mode ultrasound and duplex imaging can relate to cardiovascular disease events, and the progression of atherosclerosis, measuring not only carotid structural alterations but also reflecting the severity of arterial damage in other vascular territories such as the peripheral arterial system [4].

This pilot study aimed to examine the relationship between peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and cerebrovascular disease in an Egyptian population.


  Patients and methods Top


In this pilot study, we prospectively included 37 patients presenting to the Vascular Surgery Division, Kasr Al-Ainy University Hospitals with PAD. Patients with PAD due to causes other then atherosclerosis were excluded. This study was approved by the Cairo University research committee and all patients signed informed consent before enrollment.

Among clinical parameters recorded were age, sex, risk factors (smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity), prior history of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or neurological deficit by clinical examination (due to a cerebrovascular event), or ischemic heart disease. Patients with PAD were classified according to Rutherford categories (RCs) [5] [Table 1].
Table 1: Rutherford classification of peripheral arterial disease

Click here to view


Doppler ultrasound evaluation included the following:

Duplex ultrasonography

All patients underwent duplex ultrasound examination of both extracranial and intracranial carotid systems by a single operator blinded to the clinical data. Cerebrovascular ultrasound examination was carried out using Philips HD15000 (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) as follows:

(1) Extracranial carotid system [common carotid, internal carotid (ICA), and external carotid arteries] was examined using the linear array transducer of multifrequency (5-10 MHz), real time, sagittal, coronal, and axial views. Carotid system was examined by using the following:

(a) B-mode imaging of the arterial wall (intimal-medial thickness, plaque, stenosis, obstruction, or other pathologies).

(b) Color-coded B-mode imaging for further analysis of pathology.

(c) Doppler flow analysis:

According to the clinical significance of the duplex findings, we divided our patients into three groups [6]:

(i) Group 1: normal, mild increased intima-media thickness (IMT), stenosis less than 50% (provided the plaque was not complicated).

(ii) Group 2: stenosis 50-69%.

(iii) Group 3: stenosis greater than 70%.

(2) Intracranial carotid system was examined using the transcranial color-coded duplex examination (Philips HD15000).

Ankle-brachial index measurement

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is an easy way to compare the systolic pressure of the upper extremity with that of the affected lower extremity. The systolic pressure in the pedal arteries (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) was measured using a handheld 5-MHz Doppler probe and a blood pressure cuff. The higher of these two measurements was compared with a similarly taken brachial artery systolic pressure. A ratio (ankle/brachial) of 0.9 or less is considered a sign of impaired flow to the extremity [7]. A normal resting ABI does not exclude PAD. In patients with mild or very proximal occlusive lesions, pulses may be palpable at rest. Exercise testing increases the sensitivity of the ABI [8]. Patients were classified according to ABI into four categories:

  1. I < 0.9-0.7 (mild PAD).
  2. II < 0.7-0.5 (moderate PAD).
  3. III < 0.5-0.3 (severe PAD).
  4. VI < 0.3-0 (impending gangrene).


Management of CAD was in accordance to the international guidelines based on the data from NASCET [9], ECST [10], ACAS [11], where asymptomatic patients with ICA stenosis greater than 70% and symptomatic patients with ICA stenosis greater than 50% underwent carotid revascularization by carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting. Patients with lesser degrees of stenosis received best medical treatment in the form of antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering agents, and control of blood pressure and diabetes mellitus. PAD was managed with an open surgery or endovascular interventions according to lesion morphology and patient's fitness.

Statistical analysis

All statistical calculations were carried out using computer program statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 15 for Microsoft Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data were expressed as mean±SD, or frequencies (number of cases), and percentages according to type of data. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups was done using Student's 't' test for independent samples. χ2 -Test was performed for comparing categorical data. Exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlation between various variables was determined using Spearman's rank correlation equation. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


The study included 29 (78.4%) male and eight (21.6) female PAD patients with a mean age of 60.41±8.72 years. [Table 2] shows patients' demographic data and risk factors. Rest pain was the most frequent presentation (RC4) occurring in 19 (51.4%) patients, as shown in [Figure 1], and infrapopliteal block was the most frequent site of arterial occlusion (n = 21, 57.76%) followed by femoropopliteal (n = 15, 40.5%), and then iliofemoral (n = 1, 2.7%), as shown in [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Distribution of the presentation according to Rutherford categories.

Click here to view
Figure 2: Level of arterial occlusion.

Click here to view
Table 2: Patients' demographic data and risk factors

Click here to view


CAD was found in 20 (54.1%) patients. This proportion included a spectrum of pathologies ranging from increased IMT to high-grade stenosis. Eight (21.6%) patients had a significant degree of extracranial ICA stenosis (group 2+group 3). They included six (16.2%) patients in group 2 and two (5.4%) patients in group 3 with significantly more patients above the age of 60 years (n = 7, P = 0.017) and no sex difference (P > 0.05). There was no association between smoking, hypertension, diabetes, history of TIA/stroke, ischemic heart disease, obesity nor hyperlipidemia, and extracranial ICA stenosis (P > 0.05). Hyperlipidemia (n = 27) was the nearest to significance (P = 0.057).

All patients with moderate to severe grades of extracranial carotid stenosis in group 2 and group 3 had critical limb ischemia (RC4, RC5, and RC6). There was significant association between extracranial ICA stenosis and higher RCs (RC4, RC5, RC6, collectively; P = 0.044), but when comparing individual categories, only association to RC6 was significant (n = 4, P = 0.013).

Extracranial ICA stenosis showed no statistically significant association with lower ABI categories (P > 0.05) although ABI was significantly lower in patients with RC4-RC6 (P = 0.041) and significantly correlated to RCs (r = 0.515, P = 0.001) and grade of carotid disease (r = 0.356, P = 0.03).

Critical lower limb ischemia RC6 was significantly associated with prior history of ischemic cerebrovascular events (P = 0.009; [Table 3]).
Table 3: Relationship of different grades of critical lower limb ischemia to occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular event (transient ischemic attack/stroke)

Click here to view


Out of 37 patients, 13 (35.1%) had intracranial stenosis. Intracranial stenosis was significantly more frequent in patients aged 60 years or more (n = 10, P = 0.014) and all patients were males (P = 0.019). Intracranial stenosis was significantly associated to history of prior ischemic cerebrovascular events (n = 7, P = 0.048), critical limb ischemia RC6 (P = 0.001) [Table 4], and the presence of high grades of carotid artery stenosis in group 2 and group 3 (P < 0.0001; [Table 5]).
Table 4: Relation of intracranial stenosis to critical limb ischemia

Click here to view
Table 5: Relation of intracranial stenosis to different grades of extracranial artery disease

Click here to view


Presence of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with intracranial stenosis (P = 0.024), history of ischemic cerebrovascular events (P = 0.043), low ABI (P = 0.037), and critical limb ischemia RC6 (P = 0.032). There was no association between smoking, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, obesity, and hyperlipidemia, and intracranial stenosis (P > 0.05).


  Discussion Top


A total of 37 Egyptian patients presenting with PAD were evaluated using carotid duplex ultrasonography for the presence of CADs. Results showed that extracranial CAD was related to severity of PAD. All patients with CAD in group 2 and group 3 (n = 8) had critical limb ischemia (RC4, RC5, RC6). A relatively high proportion of patients with intracranial stenosis (n = 10) had critical limb ischemia.

Atherosclerotic ischemic diseases such as cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery, disease and PAD often exist together. Carotid duplex ultrasonography is an accuracy-proven noninvasive diagnostic examination used to detect asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, which is relatively high in PAD, and thus it can be helpful for screening population at risk [12].

The risk of stroke is substantially increased in PAD patients, and PAD is a strong independent predictor for stroke [13]. In our study, there was a significant association between PAD and prior history of ischemic cerebrovascular events (stroke/TIA).

Distribution of PAD in our patients was as follows: arterial block was mainly at infrapopliteal level (n = 21, 57.76%), followed by femoropopliteal (n = 15, 40.5%), and then iliofemoral (n = 1, 2.7%). Most of the patients presented with a RC4 (n = 14, 37.8%) and RC5 (n = 13, 35.1%). This pattern of presentation with mostly critical ischemia can be explained by the fact that most patients were referred for peripheral revascularization.

In our study, majority of the included patients were males (75.5%). A Korean study [12] showed similar male predominance (92.4%), yet it had a more or less different PAD presentation with 44.1% infrainguinal arterial disease, 34.1% aortoiliac disease, and 21.8% had combined lesions. This difference in presentation may be attributed to genetic and environmental factors.

Risk factors were distributed as follows: 64.9% of the patients were heavy smokers, 59.5% had diabetes mellitus, 43.3% had a history of coronary artery disease, 32.4% had a past history of stroke or TIA, 27% were hypertensive, and 18.9% were obese. In a meta-analysis of 19 studies by Ahmed and Al-Khaffaf [14], the most common atherosclerotic risk factor prevalent among patients in those studies was smoking (60%), followed by hypertension (47%), ischemic heart disease (34%), and diabetes mellitus (25.5%).

Duplex ultrasound scanning is considered a valuable imaging modality to evaluate carotid arteries, with high sensitivity and specificity and virtually nonexistent hazards, and is capable of differentiating between different phenotypes of carotid artery atherosclerosis, including increased intima-media thickness, plaque morphology, and carotid stenosis. These phenotypes will not necessarily have the same determinants or risk factors [15]. Duplex ultrasound remains an important tool to identify significant carotid artery stenosis, which may benefit from carotid revascularization irrespective of the ongoing debate and controversy on optimal management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis [16] with carotid endarterectomy as the present 'gold standard' treatment for suitable carotid stenosis, and carotid artery stenting procedures performed according to the specific characteristics of the patient and lesion [17]. Both procedures are better considered complementary rather than competing modes of therapy [18], each of which can be optimized with careful patient selection.

B-mode ultrasound examination of our patients who primary presented with PAD revealed CAD prevalence in 54.1% of them, ranging from a simple increase in IMT to more severe pathologies like high-grade stenosis. Eight (21.6%) patients had significant carotid stenosis (≥50), yet severe carotid artery stenosis (≥70%) was found only in two (5.4%) patients. In a study of a series of 4733 Egyptians, extracranial carotid stenosis ≥50% represented 2.5% [19] and severe stenosis (≥70%) represented less than 1% of the study population, and we concluded that extracranial carotid stenosis is relatively rare among Egyptians, and yet higher percentage of patients with carotid stenosis (50-69%) in our study may be due to different selection criteria as our aim was to relate CAD to PAD. Yun et al. [12] in their study found the prevalence of asymptomatic CAD (≥70% stenosis or occlusion) in 13.8% of the Korean patients presenting with chronic atherosclerotic lower extremity ischemia. This later study included a larger sample size (340 patients) and represented a different population with possible influence of racial and environmental factors.

Previous studies disclosing a prevalence of carotid stenosis in PAD patients ranged from 5 to 24% [12],[20],[21],[22]. Bavil et al. [23] reported that the prevalence of significant ICA stenosis (΃70% ICA stenosis but less than near occlusion) in Iranian patients with PAD is low (4.2%). These results are more or less close to ours. Close geographic distribution and racial similarities may have contributed to this similarity.

Patients with asymptomatic PAD have a significantly increased risk compared with patients without PAD. PAD is an indicator for generalized atherosclerosis, and has a high prognostic value in primary care. Early form of PAD has been underestimated, underdiagnosed, and undertreated [24]. A study conducted by Miura et al. [25] found that ∼70% of the patients with polyvascular disease had been underdiagnosed and were asymptomatic or had atypical symptoms, despite being at an increased risk for morbidity and mortality, justifying the use of systematic screening with duplex ultrasound and ABI for identifying patients at a high risk for cardiovascular events.

In contrast, a study to detect asymptomatic PAD with vascular events in patients with stroke or TIA showed that 'an abnormal ABI is prevalent in approximately one-fourth of the patients with cerebrovascular disease and identifies population at high risk of cardiovascular events over a median of 2 years'. Thus, ABI measurement can be an appropriate measure for screening patients with stroke/TIA at a high risk for peripheral vascular events [26].

In the present study, there were no significant difference in distribution of patients with and without significant extracranial carotid stenosis among ABI categories. Yet, there was a statistically significant correlation between the grade of carotid stenosis and lower ABI (P = 0.3). In addition, all patients with moderate to severe grades of carotid stenosis in group 2 and group 3 had critical limb ischemia (RC4, RC5, and RC6). This finding indicates that CAD, if present in PAD patients, would tend to be a critical pathology that will probably need intervention or may carry a higher risk and morbidity with poor prognosis.

Extracranial CAD was not significantly associated with hyperlipidemia. This contradicts previous studies that confirm the strong relation between this risk factor and CAD [27],[28]. However, Yun et al. [12] failed to demonstrate such an association, although they included only asymptomatic CAD as inclusion criterion.

Despite its wide distribution in patients (59.5%), diabetes was not associated with extracranial CAD. This is in agreement with the results of previous studies [12],[23] and might be explained on genetic or environmental basis. Yet this disagrees with the results of a study by Cina et al. [28]. Larger numbers of patients included in the latter study may explain this difference.

In our study, no statistically significant association was found between CAD and coronary artery disease. However, Yun et al. [12] found that critical ICA stenosis was more common in patients with coronary artery disease [6]. In addition, Shirani et al. [29] found carotid artery stenosis greater than 60% in 7% of the coronary artery bypass graft candidates. This difference may be attributed to the fact that Egyptians may have different cerebrovascular pathology with a predominance of intracranial stenosis [30].

Ischemic cerebrovascular events showed a statistically significant association with critical lower limb ischemia RC6 (P = 0.009) and intracranial stenosis (P = 0.048) but not to CAD greater than or equal to 50%. Cina et al. [28] found that carotid stenosis greater than or equal to 50% was associated with a history of stroke (P = 0.01). Patients with severe lower limb ischemia must be closely monitored to avoid cerebrovascular stroke (CVS) whether CAD was found or not and in presence or absence of carotid bruit [31].

Intracranial stenosis was positive in 35.1% of our PAD patients. A study conducted by Tawfik et al. [30] showed that Egyptians had more intracranial stenosis. Extracranial vessels might be distinct from intracranial ones by their response to atherosclerotic risk factors. This finding was in contrast to that of a study by Watanabe et al. [32], in which they showed that subclinical atherosclerosis of the femoral artery was strongly related to the presence of extracranial disease but not intracranial disease. In addition, racial and environmental factors may have played a role.

Intracranial stenosis showed a statistically significant association to critical limb ischemia, mainly RC6 (P = 0.001) and extracranial carotid stenosis group 2 and group 3 (P = 0.048). Ratanakorn et al. [33] showed that patients with PAD had an increased frequency of concomitant cerebrovascular events because of intracranial stenosis and that concomitant vascular disease (in general) commonly coexists. In their study, Li et al. [34] reported that patients with intracranial stenosis are strongly associated with a history of previous ischemic stroke.

In our study, both extracranial and intracranial stenosis occurred more frequently in patients aged more than 60 years. Su et al. [35] in their study found that asymptomatic intracranial stenosis was more frequent in patients aged more than 70 years, suggesting a significant impact of age on vascular pathology.

In our study, all patients with intracranial stenosis were males. The relationship between intracranial stenosis and sex is still controversial. Some studies reported female predominance, whereas other studies showed more prevalence in men, especially at younger ages [36],[37].


  Conclusion Top


Intracranial and extracranial carotid stenoses are commonly encountered in patients with PAD and may be related to PAD severity. This highlights the importance of duplex ultrasound screening for CAD presence and severity, especially in the elderly and patients with critical limb ischemia. The findings of this study and relationship between PAD and CAD with respect to vascular risk factors need to be further confirmed in a study of larger sample of Egyptians.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015; 131 :e29-e322.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Celermajer DS, Chow CK, Marijon E, Anstey NM, Woo KS. Cardiovascular disease in the developing world: prevalences, patterns, and the potential of early disease detection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60 :1207-1216.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Baroncini LA, de Oliveira A, Vidal EA, França GJ, Stahlke PS, Alessi A, Précoma DB. Appropriateness of carotid plaque and intima-media thickness assessment in routine clinical practice. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2008; 6 :52.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, et al. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 1999; 30 :841-850.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, Johnston KW, Porter JM, Ahn S, Jones DN. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26 :517-538.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
von Reutern GM, Goertler MW, Bornstein NM, Del Sette M, Evans DH, Hetzel A, et al., Neurosonology Research Group of the World Federation of Neurology Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke 2012; 43 :916-921.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Grenon SM, Gagnon J, Hsiang Y. Video in clinical medicine. Ankle-brachial index for assessment of peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 :e40.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lyden SP, Joseph D. The clinical presentation of peripheral arterial disease and guidance for early recognition. Cleve Clin J Med 2006; 73 (Suppl):S15-S21.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 :1415-1425.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351 :1379-1387.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
[No authors listed]Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995; 273 :1421-1428.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Yun WS, Rho YN, Park UJ, Lee KB, Kim DI, Kim YW. Prevalence of asymptomatic critical carotid artery stenosis in Korean patients with chronic atherosclerotic lower extremity ischemia: is a screening carotid duplex ultrasonography worthwhile? J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25 : 1167-1170.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Meves SH, Diehm C, Berger K, Pittrow D, Trampisch HJ, Burghaus I, et al. Peripheral arterial disease as an independent predictor for excess stroke morbidity and mortality in primary-care patients: 5-year results of the getABI study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010; 29 :546-554.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ahmed B, Al-Khaffaf H. Prevalence of significant asymptomatic carotid artery disease in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37 :262-271.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Spence JD, Hegele RA. Noninvasive phenotypes of atherosclerosis: similar windows but different views. Stroke 2004; 35 :649-653.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mirsharifi R, Karimian F, Farahmand MR, Aminian A. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in patients with severe peripheral vascular diseases. J Res Med Sci 2009; 14 :117-122.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Luebke T, Aleksic M, Brunkwall J. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34 :470-479.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Liu Z, Shi Z, Wang Y, Chen B, Zhu T, Si Y, Fu W. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2009; 33 :586-596.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Abd Allah F, Baligh E, Ibrahim M. Clinical relevance of carotid atherosclerosis among Egyptians: a 5-year retrospective analysis of 4,733 subjects. Neuroepidemiology. 2010; 35 :275-279.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Pilcher JM, Danaher J, Khaw KT. The prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery disease in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin Radiol 2000; 55 :56-61.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
House AK, Bell R, House J, Mastaglia F, Kumar A, D′Antuono M. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis associated with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 7 :44-49.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ascher E, DePippo P, Salles-Cunha S, Marchese J, Yorkovich W. Carotid screening with duplex ultrasound in elderly asymptomatic patients referred to a vascular surgeon: is it worthwhile? Ann Vasc Surg 1999; 13 :164-168.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bavil AS, Ghabili K, Daneshmand SE, Nemati M, Bavil MS, Namdar H, Shaafi S. Prevalence of significant carotid artery stenosis in Iranian patients with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7 :629-632.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Diehm C, Allenberg JR, Pittrow D, Mahn M, Tepohl G, Haberl RL, et al. Mortality and vascular morbidity in older adults with asymptomatic versus symptomatic peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2009; 120 : 2053-2061.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Miura T, Soga Y, Doijiri T, Aihara H, Yokoi H, Iwabuchi M, Nobuyoshi M. Prevalence and clinical outcome of polyvascular atherosclerotic disease in patients undergoing coronary intervention. Circ J 2013; 77 :89-95.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Sen S, Lynch DRJr, Kaltsas E, Simmons J, Tan WA, Kim J, et al. Association of asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease with vascular events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2009; 40 :3472-3477.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Alexandrova NA, Gibson WC, Norris JW, Maggisano R. Carotid artery stenosis in peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23 :645-649.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Cinà CS, Safar HA, Maggisano R, Bailey R, Clase CM. Prevalence and progression of internal carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36 :75-82.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shirani S, Boroumand MA, Abbasi SH, Maghsoodi N, Shakiba M, Karimi A, et al. Preoperative carotid artery screening in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Med Res 2006; 37 :987-990.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Tawfik TZ, Zaki MA, Abd Allah FA, Farrag MA, Auis EB, Hegazy MM. Distribution of atherosclerosis in Egyptian patients with ischemic stroke: extracranial versus intracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease; ultrasonographic assessment. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 2009; 46 :279-285.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Johansson EP, Wester P. Carotid bruits as predictor for carotid stenoses detected by ultrasonography: an observational study. BMC Neurol 2008; 8 :23.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Watanabe M, Kimura K, Iguchi Y, Shibazaki K, Urabe T, Hattori N. Peripheral arterial atherosclerosis in patients with extracranial, not intracranial, arterial stenosis. Intern Med 2010; 49 :1515-1519.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Ratanakorn D, Keandoungchun J, Tegeler CH. Coexistent extra- and intracranial stenosis, cervical atherosclerosis, and abnormal ankle brachial index in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 21 :782-789.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Li AH, Chu YT, Yang LH, Chen KC, Chu SH. More coronary artery stenosis, more cerebral artery stenosis? A simultaneous angiographic study discloses their strong correlation. Heart Vessels 2007; 22 :297-302.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Su LL, Huang HW, Tan SQ, Wu XH, Zhou GJ. Prevalence of asymptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in middle-aged and elderly population in the community of Foshan city, Guangdong province: a cross-sectional study. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2011; 32 :469-472.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Huang HW, Guo MH, Lin RJ, Chen YL, Luo Q, Zhang Y, Wong KS. Prevalence and risk factors of middle cerebral artery stenosis in asymptomatic residents in Rongqi County, Guangdong. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 24 :111-115.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Inzitari D, Hachinski VC, Taylor DW, Barnett HJ. Racial differences in the anterior circulation in cerebrovascular disease. How much can be explained by risk factors? Arch Neurol. 1990; 4:1080-1084.  Back to cited text no. 37
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 A Systematic Review Supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery Guidelines on the Management of Carotid Artery Disease
Bashar Hasan,Magdoleen Farah,Tarek Nayfeh,Mustapha Amin,Kostantinos Malandris,Rami Abd-Rabu,Sahrish Shah,Rami Rajjoub,Mohamed O. Seisa,Samer Saadi,Leslie Hassett,Larry J. Prokop,Ali AbuRahma,M. Hassan Murad
Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Prevalence of peripheral arterial diseases in patients with large artery ischemic stroke and its prognostic value
Sherien Farag,Mahmoud Elbalkimy,Ahmed Elbassiouny,John George,Mai Fathy
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2020; 56(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3805    
    Printed241    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded309    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]